You are the 1st person to read this article. And we thank you, our only reader, for your love and warmth.
McDonalds is The Root of All Evil
October 14th, 2005 by mike
Save the Stupid Americans From Fat
I had an interesting conversation with a friend of mine in the UK a while back… about McDonald’s. He was convinced that the Golden Arches were evil and should not be allowed to do business. Why? Because they preyed on the “less intelligent” members of society with their fast, inexpensive, tasty but unhealthy fast food.
(Mike: you mean this isn’t true??!?!?!)
After many arguments over capitalism and free market trade and simply giving people what they want, we got to the bottom line. He thought none of us dim Americans knew what good nutrition was! After I informed him that not only was good nutrition taught in schools but also was prominently featured on children’s programming, public service announcements, and many news stories, talk shows,and cooking programs he was dumbfounded. Americans know fast food is bad for them but they eat it anyway?
The fact is, people want the convenience, the taste, and the ease of fast food. It may be a bad choice, but it is a choice, not a deception or coercion.
(Mike: BTW: Not me! I haven’t eaten McDs in 4 years and counting. I feel so… much better!
Scottie: Since when are you an American, Mr Smartypants? We are all very happy for you, now back to the article…)
Spammers are the Root of All Evil
It seems the same argument applies to those who feel it is their personal duty to rid the SEO world of spam. They march under the banner of “protecting the innocents” and assume that the only reason a company would hire a spammer or employ spammy techniques on their own site is because they have been misled.
I don’t buy this argument. Not only is there a TON of excellent information out there for people to read, most of the top industry voices pretty much agree that real businesses don’t need to spam- even the top spammers will tell you most sites have no need to spam. You have to look hard to find the bad information these days- you have to bypass a dozen articles on the best way to do things to find one article on how to do the tricks.
The sad fact is that many people want to spam. Yep, I said it. Those innocent newbies often want to spam. A long, slow climb to the top is boring and takes time and work, and they want the fast track. So they seek out the tips, tricks, and “secret techniques” that they think will give them the edge. Cause they are so much smarter than everyone else, they think they can get ahead without having to work too hard.
The other thing is that we learn by doing. I think every professional today has “tested” things they would never employ on a client site, just to see if they worked, and how well. Part of being a good SEO is learning and the best way to learn is to experiment.
It’s About Free Choice
As long as people want hot, greasy fries and a Big Mac, McDonald’s will continue to thrive. Because they are selling what people want. If activists closed McD’s down, people wouldn’t then choose to stay home and make a nice green salad, they’d just go to Burger King. No one is forcing anyone to eat fast food, people do it because it’s convenient, inexpensive, and tastes pretty good! Sure, there’s a downside, it’s unhealthy and will make you fat but people accept that risk.
As long as there are people looking for the fast and easy way to the top of the search engines, there will be spammers and published spam techniques. They aren’t good for you, but you can’t stop people from finding what they want. What we can do is what the bulk of the industry already does- publish good solid information, marketing techniques that build a great site, and provide guidance to the people who do want to learn the right way, the first time.
The others will be back to learn when they realize their “super secret tricks” really don’t work. We’ll offer ‘em a nice lean roasted chicken and some ideas for real content!
Entry Filed under: Scottie's Insights







1 Comment Add your own
1. Bill Kelm | January 22nd, 2006 at 3:38 am
“Sure, there’s a downside, it’s unhealthy and will make you fat but people accept that risk” = If you get a chance to see “Super Size Me” on HBO you might see how “free choice” for fast food targeted at children is affecting everyone’s health expenses, especially health insurance costs.
You make many good and valid points nobody can dispute, but when do other people’s “free choices” (influenced greatly by talented marketing) about smoking cigarettes, etc. start affecting not just the persons using their free choice, but you and your future generations? Do we really care about anybody besides ourselves and our loved ones?
“As long as there are people looking for the fast and easy way to the top of the search engines, there will be spammers and published spam techniques. They aren’t good for you, but you can’t stop people from finding what they want.” = I totally agree and education is the key, but education is very time consuming for the people who want it. The SEO prospects that don’t have the time to follow all or most of Nacho’s great advice ( http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showpost.php?p=17495&postcount=1 ) will have to be left to the negative results of P.T. Barnum’s quote: “There’s a sucker born every day” as well as the ever present “buyer beware”. Even if the SEO prospect is not “misled”, the reputation of the SEM Industry can be negatively affected (see how, IMO, below).
I hope the SEM industry follows Danny Sullivan’s keynote advice: “Sullivan went on to cite a variety of examples where members of the SEM community have begun to take a stronger stand against the very worst practices perpetrated by members “not in good standing.” Sullivan believes in a broadly inclusive community, save for those who refuse to accept the basic rules of society—these, Sullivan seems to think, should be banished from the loop (clearly Danny’s been reading Jean-Jacques Rousseau).” See = http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3577081
Besides probably T.Power (IMO), how far, and doing what as a SEO, would be included in “those who refuse to accept the basic rules of society”? So, wouldn’t the “free choices” of SEO prospects (influenced by talented marketing) affect the overall reputation of the entire industry (now and in the future), because the SEO’s not doing ANY KIND OF SPAM (including the kinds that can be gotten away with = http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showpost.php?p=30957&postcount=28 ) are forced to be “competitive”, if they want to provide the level of ROI type results that many SEO buyers want?
“The others will be back to learn when they realize their “super secret tricks” really don’t work.” = This is certainly true, especially in the “long term”, but what happens to the SEM Industry in the mean time as far as its “reputation” is concerned. WOM is spreading faster these days amongst SEO buyers with industry association like the ANA, blogs, chat rooms, IM, etc..
Therfore, because I am for the HEALTHY growth of the SEO-SEM Industry (in the SHORT, as well as, long term), I hope Danny (gotta respect him!) or somebody figures out what are the specific determining factors when it is appropriate for Industry Associations (or some entity besides the government getting directly involved) to make informed judgements when it is appropriate for a search marketer to “be banished from the loop” (hopefully, that means some kind of serious and lasting ramifications).
Thanks for the opportunity for my “rant” and “my 2 cents”.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed